In the semi-conductor and micro-processing industry for
example, and in technology as a whole, patents are the true metric indicating
the firm’s futurity of value. The means of unitary cost-per-patent optimisation
through bottle-neck removals in the coordination of a sound CVC-process will
yield the highest value in a complex corporate portfolio. This, in turn, will
translate into an ability to “attack and defend ground” within the industry in
developing barriers to entry, maintain and increase revenue, stabilize costs,
reduce Beta within the volatile market, and increase the real return to
shareholders outside of manipulating market capitalisation through short-term
share-buy backs, or other “share-price pumping” strategies. However, although
complex valuation models are regularly deployed by acquirers, the underlying
strategy which determines key performance metrics, integration and absorption
ability, and post-acquisition performance continues to be greatly influenced by
the target’s industry, its geographical location, as well as the purpose of the
investment or acquisition.
CVC and M&A strategies do appear to be generating
wealth, as demonstrated by the significant link between Tobin’s Q and its cost-per-patent. There are several implications for practitioners; notably,
non-sporadic CVC patterns may generate value should the process be optimized
both ex ante to ex post: from target-selection to post-integration.
Specifically, in following with RBV in dynamic, short life-cycle “red-ocean”
industries, CVC is a means of acquiring assets which in turn yields future
competitiveness. The success of such CVC investments relies on the experience
of the managerial team – their personal and group attributes, the company’s
CVC-specific arm – or lack thereof, the extent to which consideration to
cultural and general CAGE factors is done within the balance between
independence and integration, and their absorption ability. Finally, managers
may be required to revisit their true sources of competitive advantages in the
form of resources available and pivot their attention to generating resources
for “tomorrow”. In the semi-conductor and micro processing industry, and in
technology as a whole, patents are the true metric indicating the firm’s
futurity of value. The means of unitary cost-per-patent optimisation through
bottle-neck removals in the coordination of a sound CVC-process will yield the
highest value in a complex corporate portfolio. This in turn will translate
into an ability to “attack and defend ground” within the industry, maintain and
increase revenue, stabilize costs, reduce Beta within the volatile market, and
increase the real return to shareholders outside of manipulating market
capitalisation through short-term share-buy backs, or other “share-price pumping”
strategies. Although, a case-by-case assessment of the company’s market
capitalisation, cost of capital structure (WACC), as well as their current
subsidiary and investment portfolio is necessary to find the optimal position
of RBV asset-generation strategies within the parameters offered. The
implications invite a review of the efficacity of all stages of the CVC and
M&A process, and the stakeholders involved, as well as assessing intra-CVC
innovations through the creations of joint-ventures or alliances between
various CVCs under the same parent.